The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding) is that the defendant works as an employee at the Eju station in the Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Group as an employee, and he takes 3.60,000 won from the victim F's wallet, and he did not take 20,000 won in cash from the victim D with the calculation unit of the gas station, the court below convicted him of the facts charged in this case. The judgment of the court below is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., the victim F, an employee of the Eju station operated by the victim D, after completing the business of the Eju station on the day of the instant case and providing meals at the outside, return to the Eju station located within the Eju station at around 21:0, and ② the victim F, who was the defendant and the victim F, did so at the home office. The defendant and the victim F paid the victim F’s own cash at the home office of the victim, with his own son’s own son’s own son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son and son’s son’s 200.