Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant managed FMW 320i vehicles in the name of C in the name of FM 320i vehicle under the name of C, a representative member, C (hereinafter “C”) in the unlimited partnership company C (hereinafter “C”).

G Burial D around November 201, 201, at G stores located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I requested D to trade the said FMW vehicle with the BM new order. On April 201, 201, the Defendant received phone calls from H to the effect that “I do not have any anything else as a non-accidentd vehicle” to the effect that “I do not have any anything else as a non-accidentd vehicle.”

However, in fact, the above FMW vehicle was an accident that caused an accident to the extent that the defendant would have to completely replace the front package of the vehicle while driving.

After all, the Defendant, around April 19, 2012, caused H to make a false statement to the effect that the Defendant was a non-accidentd vehicle while selling the said FMW vehicle to the victim J at the said G store.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim through H without knowledge of the circumstance, caused the victim to purchase the above vehicle in the same day from the victim to the financial account in the name of C, and 15 million won to the financial account in the name of C, and 13.5 million won to the financial account in the name of Dominter, Dominter, Inc., to receive the above amount of 28.5 million won from the victim to the above vehicle price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of each law to police statement by J and H

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and Articles 347(2) and (1), and 34(1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fines) (Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, inasmuch as the public prosecutor was prosecuted under Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, but the purchase price acquired by deceit is deemed to have been reverted to the corporation that is a

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;