logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2016.03.30 2015고정691
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 27, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on August 27, 2015, due to a violation of road traffic law (dacting driving) in the support for the safeness of the methods of water sources, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 4, 2015.

The defendant is a person who is working as a used motor vehicle in D motor vehicles in Suwon-si C.

1. On November 19, 2014, around 16:40 on November 19, 2014, the Defendant: (a) stated, “The victim E, the representative of the said office, that “The Defendant deposited the purchase price of the vehicle XG car, 2005, which is a non-accidentd vehicle, at KRW 4 million.”

However, even if the defendant received money, he did not have the intention or ability to purchase the above vehicle.

However, the defendant acquired 4 million won through the account (Account Number:F) of the Korean bank name of the defendant from a person who is unaware of the same day on the same day.

2. On December 26, 2014, at around 17:10 on December 26, 2014, the Defendant against the Victim G, the Defendant intended to purchase one of the Victim G, a used car with the same workplace, and a used car with the same used cars, for KRW 2 million.

The term “money deposited” was called “......”.

However, even if the defendant received money, he did not have the intention or ability to purchase the above vehicle.

However, the defendant acquired 2 million won through the above bank account in the name of the defendant from the victim who is unaware of the same day on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G;

1. Statement protocol of E prepared by the police;

1. A copy of a certificate of transfer confirmation, and a copy of each deposit certificate;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, text of judgment, and information inquiry-related statutes, such as each criminal history;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The first sentence of Article 37 of the Criminal Act for the treatment of concurrent crimes: Provided, That the first sentence of Article 39 (1);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70 of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

arrow