beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Defendant
A does not pay the above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On June 14, 2014, around 00:19, the Defendants were drinking alcohol with victim E (31 years of age) in the area near the Dong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Yandong-gu C market. When Defendant B and the victim were dissatisfied with the occurrence of a trial expense, Defendant A were able to take off the victim behind and take back the victim, and the face part of the victim’s face was sent back to several times.
As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the closed 42-day treatment, the upper dynasium, etc.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants by the prosecution
1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;
1. Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act as to the facts constituting an offense, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fine A and Selection of Imprisonment B)
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse (Defendant A);
1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant A);
1. The fact that Defendant A’s only agree with and reflects on the victim’s agreement (criminal conciliation and sincere practice), and that there is no record of crime at all;
2. In light of the fact that Defendant B [the scope of recommendations] is not a person who has no basic area (from April to 16) (the person who has a special form of punishment) (the decision of sentence) (the person who has a special form of punishment) (the decision of sentence) and is a crime committed during the period of probation after being sentenced to a suspended sentence for the same kind of crime, and that it seems that there was no effort to pay for damage, it is considered that Defendant A, who is an accomplice, has been partly damaged by the victim.