beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of two million won.
Defendant
B The above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. When the time was late for the victim A (the age of 28) who was aware of the appointment from the military forces, and was satisfyed in the course of returning home, Defendant B demanded the victim to settle other movies on the ground that there was no film in the course of watching the film in Busan Shipping Daegu at around 01:00 on May 15, 2014, the victim was accommodated in the Gelel located in Busan Shipping Daegu, and had the victim settle KRW 6,500, and had the victim settle the film at that place, and had the film do so. However, the victim expressed that there was a lot of money for whom he was refused to do so. Accordingly, the victim was satisfying the victim’s chest and earing by hand, and the victim was satisfying the external wound of a 21-day therapy that requires medical treatment for about 21 days.
2. The defendant A’s date and time set forth in paragraph (1), at a place mentioned in paragraph (1) for the same reasons as mentioned in paragraph (1), when the victim B (29 years of age) was dissatisfied with the victim’s emulhion, which is a dangerous thing in which he was responsible, and when the second defendant tried to see the victim as a glass cup, the victim’s left hand was prevented. In addition, the victim’s emulhion, etc. of the victim’s emulhion, which is a dangerous thing, requires treatment for about 42 days on the left side of the victim.
The results of this study are as follows: Mega pathic pathic pathic pathics.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;
1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, and Article 257 (1) 2 of the Criminal Act: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. Defendant A subject to discretionary mitigation: Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act ( Taking into account the relationship with the victim, the background leading up to the dispute with the victim, and the fact that the mistake is recognized);
1. Defendant B of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;
1. Defendant A who has been suspended from execution: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the aforementioned conditions shall be repeatedly considered).