(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.01.28 2013가단37715

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.01.28 2013가단37715

건물철거 및 토지인도

Text

1. The plaintiff (appointed party) and the selected party E:

A. Defendant B shall draw up the attached Form 2 among the real estate listed in the attached Table 1 list.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “instant real estate”) was owned by the Defendants, respectively, 1/6 shares, 1.65/10 shares, and 1.7/10 shares, respectively. On February 12, 2013, the voluntary auction procedure for partition of co-owned property was commenced for the remaining shares, excluding 1.65/10 shares, out of the shares, of the Plaintiff (the captain)’s share. On June 21, 2013, the said auction procedure commenced. On June 21, 2013, Go (Appointed Party) was awarded a successful bid for each of the 1/2 shares and paid in full by the Appointed Party (Appointed Party) and E became the owner of each of 1/2 shares, respectively.

B. Of the instant real estate, Defendant B, in sequence with each of the points indicated in the attached Table 2 drawings 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 1, connected with each of the above points, Defendant B’s “A” portion (hereinafter “the instant part”) of “A” on the ground of cement brick structure, cement brick structure, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 8; Defendant C, in sequence with each of the above points indicated in the same drawings (hereinafter “bbbbbb” in this case); Defendant C used the instant portion of “A” and the instant portion of “A” in which the instant portion of “A” (hereinafter “the instant portion”) was owned by 24,00 square meters and the instant portion of “A” and the instant portion of “A” were owned by 24,000 square meters and 24,0000 square meters of the instant cement type.

C. Meanwhile, among the instant land, rent for the year 2013 and the year 2014 for the portion of the instant “1,” “2,” “3,” and “33,” are as indicated in attached Form 3.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap Nos. 1 and 2, the result of appraiser H’s survey and appraisal, the result of appraiser I’s survey and appraisal, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the facts acknowledged above, there are no special circumstances, according to the judgment on the cause of the claim.

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2016.02.17 2015가단43627

-수원지방법원 2018.05.29 2016가단518785

-청주지방법원 2015.08.20 2014가단160605

-인천지방법원 2018.12.12 2018가단201237

-부산지방법원 2016.07.14 2015가단56808