(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.02.14 2016나2060370

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.02.14 2016나2060370

손해배상(의)

Text

1. The judgment of the first instance, including the plaintiffs' claims changed in this court, is modified as follows.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The parties 1) The defendant is the E Hospital located in the Gu of Ansan-si (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

(2) The Plaintiff A is a medical corporation that operates the medical corporation. (2) The Plaintiff A is identified by K (hereinafter “the deceased”) who died on November 23, 2013, and the Plaintiff B and C are the deceased’s children.

B. 1) On November 13, 2013, the Deceased complained of the upper part of the body flag, which occurred more than three days prior to 00:07, and visited the Defendant hospital emergency room. The Defendant hospital medical personnel provided the Deceased with X-ray shooting and blood test, etc. After the Deceased’s symptoms, the Deceased was released from the hospital around 01:35 on November 16, 2013, and the Deceased complained of the second part of the body flag.

The deceased was subject to the Cho Young-chul CT inspection, and was subject to the above-mentioned cT inspection on November 18, 2013 in the form of a gold.

3) On November 18, 2013, the Deceased was inspected on the surface of the water at the department located in the Defendant Hospital on the day of November 18, 2013, and the result showed chilling infection. However, on November 16, 2013, as a result of the aforementioned round CT inspection on the part of the Plaintiff, the medical professionals at the Defendant Hospital observed the tinc and the tincs of the gurogate of the gurogate. Accordingly, the medical professionals at the Defendant Hospital added the internal vision to the duromatic eptrophal dystrophacopacopa Pancreacreapyphy, and the ERCP.

(4) On November 19, 2013, the following day after the ERCP enters into force, the medical personnel at the Defendant hospital determined that a reciting reciting is necessary for the deceased’s removal of the reciting gate, and carried out a reciting reciting gate from around 12:26 to 14:31 on November 20, 201, from around 12:26 to 14:31 on the following day.

C. The Deceased who was the BT inspector of the deceased shall make a re-written re-written wing.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원안양지원 2014.01.24 2011가합4372

-인천지방법원 2020.10.16 2016가단232886

-부산지방법원 2019.06.25 2017가단337570

-서울고등법원 2016.10.27 2015나2041990

-인천지방법원 2019.12.17 2017가합60276