logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2015.12.22 2015고단546
특수공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 3, 2015, at around 08:30 on September 3, 2015, the Defendant was unable to have avoided a disturbance while engaging in a dispute with the Defendant’s wife due to the Defendant’s influorial problem at the Defendant’s house located in the Go Chang-gun Village B.

Since then, the defendant damaged the plastic houses and ancient field crops owned by the defendant, which are located in the Nab and adjacent farmland in the house, using the Trackter.

At that time, the reason D, and E of the staff of the Go Changdong Police Station C Public Security Center called the Defendant to “a fluent fluent fluent fluent flus, because he was dispatched after receiving a report on domestic violence.”

However, the defendant did not comply with this and called "I cannot see.D.," and the above police officers did not return to confirm the 112 reported matters, and the defendant did not go to the above police officers "I.," and driving a Track for the above police officers to go to the place where the police officers and the police cars are located.

Therefore, after the police officers kept their body purely, the police vehicles are required to move the police vehicles to a place less than 10 meters away from the Act No. 10, which is likely to get the police vehicles to get the police vehicles. However, the defendant, without complying with the request, was driving the Track again, driving the Track on one occasion without complying with the request, thereby leading the police officers.

As a result, the defendant used a track, which is a dangerous object, and thereby interfered with the police officers' legitimate performance of official duties related to the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement D and E (Simplified common);

1. Reports on internal investigation by the police (on-site photographs);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation by the prosecution (report on telephone confirmation, such as the dispatch situation to the opposite site by the escape police officer);

1. Articles 144 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of the penalty;

arrow