A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 28, 2013, at around 00:15, the Defendant, while driving a vehicle while drinking alcohol and driving the vehicle, was taken a alcohol test at around 00:15 by the police officer E belonging to the Eunpyeong Police Station D police box, who was called out after being reported as a pedestrian and vision. The Defendant was taken a alcohol test corresponding to the grounds for revocation of driver’s license.

1. The Defendant raised an objection to the foregoing drinking alcohol processing, and requested a police officer in charge of the investigation of the family police station located in Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu, Gyeonggi-do, to collect blood, but the Defendant refused to collect blood at the D police box located in the Dongdong-gu, but was refused to do so on the ground that he could not collect blood after a certain period of time. As such, the Defendant again left a cab and called the D police box.

At around 05:00 on April 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) considered the police officer E, who was working in the D police box located in the F of Gyeonggi-gun F of F of the games, as “drawing to know why they would collect blood”; (b) taken the arrest of the Defendant on the office’s book, such as the arrest report on the driver’s situation, the investigation report, the investigation report on the driver’s status, and the voluntary performance report on the driver status.

Accordingly, the defendant, who is a public office, has harmed the utility of documents used by the above D Boxes.

2. On April 28, 2013, the obstruction of performance of official duties and the Defendant: (a) at around 05:05 on April 28, 2013, the police box was damaged by official documents, such as the preceding paragraph; (b) G during the process of the police box around 05:05; and (c) the police officer, in order to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender, she resisted the defective resistance; and (d) “The hin, hin, kin, farb, farb, farb, farb, farb, farb, farb farb

As a result, the Defendant, who is a police officer, committed an act of cutting the body of the pelpel and the body of the pelpel and the body of the pelpel and the body of the pelpel and the body of the pel and the body of the pel and the body of the police.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Each photograph;

1. A medical certificate;