1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 10,00,000 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from April 24, 2012 to June 19, 2018; and (b) June 2018 for the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The parties concerned are dentists who run dental clinics (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) at the Seo-gu Busan Metropolitan City, and the Plaintiff is a person who has undergone a crym operation from the Defendant.

B. (i) On April 13, 2012, the Plaintiff first introduced the Defendant Hospital as its main opinion on the Plaintiff’s completion of the Plaintiff’s crypt surgery. As a result of a close inspection of the Plaintiff’s crypt radiation shooting and marma radiation photographing, etc., the Defendant is as specified in the attached Table the specific cryp name and the cryp number that is described below the Plaintiff’s crypology:

In addition, it was confirmed that the steel products were seriously boomed.

She, the Plaintiff: (a) ordered the Defendant to perform three crypt operations on the left and e-mail, and agreed to do so; and (b) agreed to do six crypt operations on both sides (hereinafter “instant operations”).

On April 17, 2012, the defendant hospital removed the head of the 3 Daegu (Ma18), Daegu (Ma17), Daegu (Ma16), Daegu (Ma16), and the 2nd (Ma15) from the 3 Daegu (Ma18), and the 2nd (Ma15). On April 17, 2012, the defendant hospital published the first 1th Ma14 (Ma14), the second Maak (Ma25), and the second Ma27 (Ma27).

Applicant On April 24, 2012, the Defendant Hospital carried out an artificial bones transplant on the part of the Plaintiff on the first place of the right music (Ma14), the first place of the Daegu (Ma16), and the second place of the Daegu (Ma17). At the same time, the Defendant Hospital carried out an artificial bones transplant on the part of the stem cell body formation chemicals. On May 1, 2012, the Defendant Hospital carried out the second place of the second place of the stem cell body (Ma25), the first Daegu (Ma26), and the second Daegu (Ma27) using the stem cell body formation system.

At the time, the defendant hospital, based on the judgment that the vertical aggregate of the plaintiff's scopical scopic scopic scopical scopic is not sufficient to plant the scopic scopic.