The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2013. 12. 29.경 인터넷 사이트 일베저장소(www.ilbe.com)의 일베 게시판에 성명불상자가 “C”라는 제목으로 피해자 D이 작성한 기사를 게시하자 ‘E’이라는 닉네임을 사용하여 “기자가 중졸인 듯, 농담과 진담의 구분도 못 하는게 요즘 기자수준이네. 기자욕은 지가 다 쳐먹이는 줄 모르고, 특종 취재할 능력도 없어서 일베가 무슨 병신짓 하나 감시나 하고 있구나. 기자정신이라고는 눈꼽만큼도 없는 인간이 무슨 기자라고 기자가 뭔지도 모르는 새끼들이 기자하니깐 신문의 신뢰가 떨어지는 거다. 퉤퉤퉤!!!”라고 댓글을 작성하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (in response to suspect information) and report on investigation (in addition to suspect reporting);

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Penalty fine of 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (that there is no previous conviction against the Defendant, and that the motive and circumstance of the instant crime) of the suspended sentence (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da15488, Apr. 2, 2009) of the suspended sentence, the Defendant asserts that the Defendant prepared the instant comments to the effect that the victim did not confirm the fact and did not

“Contempt” as referred to in the crime of insult is an expression of an abstract judgment or a sacrific sentiment that may undermine a person’s social evaluation without mentioning facts. In the case of insulting expressions, if such expressions can be viewed as acts that do not contravene the social norms in light of the sound social norms of the times, illegality is exceptionally committed in accordance with Article 20 of the Criminal Act.