1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiffs and the defendant are those of net F (Death of February 26, 1989).

B. On February 26, 1989, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of the inheritance of property on February 26, 1989 with respect to G forest land G 8,231 square meters (hereinafter “instant land before the instant subdivision”).

C. The instant land prior to the instant subdivision was divided on June 12, 2014, and became KRW 2,426 square meters of G forest and H forest and KRW 5,805 square meters of land (after that, 5,805 square meters of the said forest were expropriated in the Sejong High-Tech Industrial Complex, and the said Company deposited KRW 307,682,750 of the said forest and land as compensation for expropriation). The said G 2,426 square meters of the said forest were subdivided on December 10, 2012 and became each land listed in the separate sheet.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 to 5 evidence (including paper numbers), fact-finding results on Sejong High-Tech Industrial Complex Corporation, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiffs asserted and determined that the Defendant solely registered the land before the subdivision of this case and developed the land before the subdivision of this case, and distributed the compensation in accordance with the inheritance shares if the compensation is delayed, sales shall be made and distributed in accordance with the inheritance shares if the compensation is delayed. If sales are delayed, the Plaintiffs sought payment of the compensation for expropriation calculated according to their respective inheritance shares, and seek performance of the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer according to the inheritance shares for each land listed in the separate sheet.

However, since there is no evidence to prove the fact that the defendant agreed as alleged by the plaintiff, the above assertion is without merit.

3. Dismissal of the Plaintiffs’ claim