logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.02.28 2017고단1724
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 5, 2017, at around 01:15, the Defendant, at around 01:15, instructed the Defendant to return home, a victim E (37 tax) who is the police officer belonging to the police unit of the police station D District in Daegu-gu Police Station, the Defendant: (a) sent a bath to “I am home”; (b) assaulted the Defendant at one time to “I am going home immediately after I am going home”; (c) obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the maintenance of public safety and order; (d) at the same time, the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the maintenance of public order and order; and (e) damaged the face that requires two-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A report on internal investigation (a statement made orally by a stude);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment of a medical certificate of injury);

1. Article 257 (1) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that the defendant is against the person committed the crime of this case, there is no previous conviction exceeding the records of the same kind of crime or fine, the degree of injury is relatively minor, and other circumstances shown in the argument of this case are considered

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

arrow