A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On June 19, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., and one year of imprisonment with prison labor and additional collection of 100,000 won for property damage in the Seo-gu District Court’s Seo branch branch, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Southern Prison on February 22, 2015.

(1) On October 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 16:40 on October 24, 2015, and (b) 16:40 on the Daegu-gu Police Station D, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, under the influence of alcohol, expressed a desire to go home; and (c) the police officer affiliated with the said earth E recommended him to go home; (d) was spit off the f’s face; and (e) was spit off the f’s face; and (e) was arrested as a flagrant offender, the Defendant assaulted the f’s bridge to walk on three occasions.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. A criminal investigation report (to attachCCTV CDs);

1. A report on internal investigation (the situation, etc. in which the main cancellation is concerned);

1. Previous convictions: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report (the confirmation of criminal suspects, repeated crimes and criminal records of the same kind);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing Article 35 of the Aggravation of Aggravation of Aggravation of Cumulative Offense was subject to a punishment of approximately 40 times for fear of the same crime (including the previous and four times the previous crimes). In particular, in consideration of the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he had the record of being sentenced to imprisonment for one year due to a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (fence) around June 2014, even though he had been sentenced to several fines due to interference with business affairs, etc. even after he was sentenced to a punishment for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc.,

Accordingly, it appears that the defendant led to the confession of the crime, and the attitude against his depth, and the degree of assault against the police officers of the defendant is relatively somewhat weak (the head of the crime).