A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 25, 2013, around 22:35, the Defendant arrested the victim as a flagrant offender by insulting E in front of the DNA agency located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Seoul, the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station’s position in the traffic control department. On the back of the patrol vehicle moving to the Geumcheon Police Station, the Defendant saw the victim F (36 years of age) of the slope victim’s slope belonging to the traffic safety department of the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station, where the victim walked him at several times from the front seat of the patrol vehicle moving to the Geumcheon Police Station, and tried the victim’s buckbucks, etc. on two occasions.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the investigation of the crime by police officers, and at the same time, the victim's right completion, the right chest, the right chest, and the interview.

2. On the same day, the Defendant was required to comply with a drinking test by inserting approximately 30 minutes in the office of the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, for a significant reason to recognize that he driven a G motorcycle while driving the G motorcycle without wearing a safety appearance at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of the Road Traffic Act, by controlling the police officer and smelling it in the Defendant’s entrance, with the face being snicking, with red, and with the walking distance, etc., at around 22:49 on the same day, at around 30 minutes from the slope belonging to the above police station in the direction of traffic control of the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu.

Nevertheless, the defendant avoided drinking so that he did not comply with a police officer's request for a drinking test without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. Photographss of damaged parts of the victim and on-site photographs;

1. Application of the legislation in its opinion;

1. Relevant Articles 257(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, Article 148-2(1)2 of the Road Traffic Act;