1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

A. The Defendant is a legal entity that operates steel manufacturing business, and the Plaintiff joined the Defendant on June 10, 1991 and served as an engine driver from around 2002 to C operated by the Defendant.

B. On March 2016, a civil petitioner D (hereinafter “civil petitioner”) filed a civil petition with the Defendant to the effect that “the Plaintiff intimidations a civil petitioner, assaults a sexually, and frequently sent obscene pictures.”

On April 15, 2016, the Defendant referred the Plaintiff to the Committee for Committee of Committee of Committee of Committee of Committee of Committee based on the above civil petition and demanded the Plaintiff to attend the said Committee.

On April 18, 2016, the Plaintiff prepared a vindication and submitted it to the Defendant.

C. On April 20, 2016, the Defendant held a personnel committee to deliberate on the Plaintiff’s injury to dignity or neglect of duty. On April 21, 2016, it is recognized that the Defendant committed the instant misconduct (hereinafter “instant misconduct”) on the grounds that “the Plaintiff, as an engine driver, violated Article 6 of the Rules of Employment, and Article 59 of the Service Management Guidelines by violating the rules of employment, and impairing the order of work, constitutes “Article 1, 2, 5, and 9 of the Rules of Employment” on the grounds that “the Plaintiff’s act falls under the grounds prescribed in Article 51(1) of the Rules of Employment, on the grounds that he/she taken photographs and videos constituting a part of his/her body while on duty as an engine driver and sent them to the civil petitioner, frequently and at any time during his/her working hours, provided personal currency with the civil petitioner, or provided continuous and inappropriate relationship with the civil petitioner.” The Plaintiff was subject to disciplinary dismissal (hereinafter “the disciplinary dismissal”).

Accordingly, the plaintiff appealed and filed a petition for a new trial against the defendant.

On June 16, 2016, the defendant is affiliated with the Class A personnel committee of less than the Class B personnel committee for review of disciplinary action.