logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2020.05.28 2019구합79299
부당해고구제재심판정취소
Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the participation.

Reasons

The plaintiff is a corporation that is established on December 7, 2009 and ordinarily employs more than 200 workers and engages in sanitary management service business, facility security business, etc.

An intervenor is a person who was employed by the Plaintiff Company on March 1, 2016 and served as a guard leader at the Korea Electric Power Corporation’s Agency.

No. : Notice of Termination of Contracts and Decision of the Information Disciplinary Committee for Application for Review according to the second decision of the Disciplinary Committee.

1. Termination of a contract ( December 31, 2018);

2. Maintaining the standby status by the termination date of the contract;

(Maintenance of their Stack and Pay Conditions) Reasons for termination of the contract

1. Workers' behavior 1) Where the monthly period of absence from work without permission under Article 10 subparag. 2 of the Rules of Employment is more than three times a month after adding up the unauthorized dismissal, early retirement, and absence from work, Article 10 subparag. 4 of the Rules of Employment (unfaithful act, false speech, dispute between employees), Article 10 subparag. 8 of the Rules of Employment, which is public funds under Article 10 subparag. 8 of the Rules of Employment, is useful, taken in good faith, or money and entertainment in the course of work, or where he/she takes money and valuables or entertainment against Article 10 subparag. 18 of the Rules of Employment when he/she takes advantage of the public funds under Article 10 subparag. 18 of the Rules of Employment or prepares, forges, or alters the rules of employment when he/she violates labor contracts under Article 10 subparag. 22 of the Rules of Employment, employment rules, or legitimate business orders, in cases where he/she violates Article 10 subparag. 32 of the Rules of Employment, which violates the rules of employment rules of employment without permission under Article 10 subparag. 37

arrow