1. The Defendant’s KRW 92,537,236 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from February 3, 2016 to April 26, 2017.

1. Basic facts

A. On January 29, 2016, the Plaintiff was released from stairs, and the face was faced to the emergency room of the Defendant on the same day. On the same day, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as a gate to the right side as a result of the internal computerization of the internal computer system, and decided to provide a surgical treatment after she was seated through a sexual surgery, internal surgery, and a compromise. 2) On January 31, 2016, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant’s sexual surgery.

2.1. The operation was completed at around 16:30 on the receipt of an fluoral fluoral surgery.

The plaintiff next day.

2. 2. Progress 2. It was determined that the process has improved and there was no particular proof of merger, and discharged.

B. From 23:00 on the day of discharge, the Plaintiff was in the emergency room of the Defendant from around 23:0 to around 200, the Plaintiff was in the emergency room of the Defendant, who was marbly mixed with clicks in visual form, and was in the emergency room of the Defendant around 02:0 on February 3, 2016.

After conducting blood tests, the medical personnel in the emergency room contacted the Plaintiff with the sexual surgery that performed the said surgery, and the medical personnel in the department B, who is a sexual surgery and the doctor on duty, prescribed the medical personnel in the emergency room, based on the following: “The possibility of occurrence of mergers, such as visual and rear blood transfusion, may occur, but the likelihood of occurrence of natural progress, which is not acute blood transfusion, is higher than that of the natural progress, after the surgery, is determined to be the second day after the surgery.”

2.5. The measures were taken for returning home after guiding the tracking observation in the outpatient treatment scheduled to be taken.

C. On February 5, 2016, Defendant sexual surgery and medical professionals, who performed emergency surgery, requested the Plaintiff to provide treatment with severe staleology along with staleology at the time of the Plaintiff’s outpatient treatment. Upon observation of staleology at the time of the Plaintiff’s outpatient treatment, Defendant sexual surgery and medical professionals diagnosed stale and rear stale, and performed emergency staleology treatment.

Despite the plaintiff's current state of blood transfusion, the plaintiff is under the state of permanent real name of friendly emerculation, which is the main cause of pressure of emerculation caused by emercosis from emerculation.