logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.07.23 2018가단5033308
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 11,675,408 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from October 10, 2017 to July 23, 2019, and the following.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. (1) On September 28, 2017, the Plaintiff entered into a hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) around September 29, 2017, following the Plaintiff’s pain on the left-hand high-class refund around 18:00 and around September 29, 2017.

(2) The medical professionals at the Defendant hospital confirmed that, on September 29, 2017, after conducting a high-frequency test for the Plaintiff, the blood professionals at the Defendant hospital confirmed the normal view that they are going back if they stimulates the part of the Plaintiff in the front side of the retirement from the hospital, and provided the Plaintiff with an instruction to undergo the outpatients and outpatients treatment on the day, and released the Plaintiff, and then released the Plaintiff. (2) On September 29, 2017, the medical professionals at the Defendant hospital conducted a high-frequency test for the Plaintiff to ensure that the blood flow of the blood museum is smooth, while checking the blood flow of the blood museum to be returned to the Plaintiff, and observe the left side side of the Plaintiff, including Plaintiff 17 and Plaintiff 170 and Plaintiff 170 et al., al., and satisfying the left side of the Plaintiff.

3) The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital discharged the Plaintiff on October 1, 2017, in which the Plaintiff’s pain was crypted while being hospitalized, and the Plaintiff’s crypted and crypted on the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of October 10, 2017.

The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital provided guidance to the Plaintiff on the day without any particular examination or diagnosis, and then discharged the Plaintiff at around 02:01.

2) On October 10, 2017, around 10:45, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital diagnosed the Plaintiff as a high-speed salt farm on the left-hand side as a result of the Plaintiff’s high-frequency test on the overall side of the Plaintiff’s high-frequency test. From around 11:19, the Plaintiff hospitalized the Plaintiff at around 16:0 to 17:24, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital diagnosed the Plaintiff as a high-speed salt farm on the left-hand left-hand side (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

AB implemented this Act.

C. At present, the plaintiff is now in this case.

arrow