2015Guhap1738 2010 201 2012

A person shall be appointed.

A person shall be appointed.

August 25, 2016

September 22, 2016

1. The defendant against the plaintiff:

(a) 33,180,00 won borne by the burden-bearing entity for one block on July 30, 2013;

(b) on July 30, 2013: (a) the amount borne by the obligor for the 72, 755, and 00 won for the 8 blocks B-8 blocks of the Ginam Innovation Zone:

(c)on June 11, 2014, the amount borne by the obligor for the 75,024,00 units for the 10 blocks A-10 blocks of the Ginam Innovation Zone:

Each disposition of imposition confirms that it is all null and void.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

The order is as set forth in the text.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff, the project implementer of the Jeonju Innovation Urban Development Project under the Special Act on the Construction and Support of Innovation Cities Following Relocation of Public Agencies, created a housing site in the Innovation Urban Development Project District (hereinafter referred to as the “Gu of this case”) and applied for water supply construction to the Defendant in the process of constructing an apartment site (hereinafter referred to as “the apartment of this case”) in part of the housing site.

B. Accordingly, on July 30, 2013, the Defendant imposed on the Plaintiff each imposition disposition of KRW 33,180,00 on the burden of borne by the Plaintiff for one block B, and KRW 72,755,00 on the burden of borne by the Plaintiff for eight block B, on July 30, 2013, and on June 11, 2014, each disposition of imposition of KRW 75,024,00 on the burden of the former Special Metropolitan City Innovation Project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant disposition”).

【Ground for recognition】 Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The legality of the instant disposition

A. The plaintiff's assertion

1) Of Article 2 subparagraph 1 (a) of the Ordinance on the Calculation, Collection, etc. of Charges for Charges on Water Supply at Jeonju (hereinafter referred to as the "Ordinance of this case"), Article 2 subparagraph 1 (a) of the Act on the Calculation, Collection, etc. of Charges on Charges on Water Supply and Waterworks (hereinafter referred to as the "Ordinance of this case"), "it includes cases where the installation of facilities using water and the use of existing facilities causing the new construction and extension of waterworks in the future, which are not delegated by Article 71 of the Water Supply and Waterworks Installation Act, is null and void since the enactment of the matters that are not delegated by the upper law, and if the Defendant took the disposition of this case by deeming the construction of the instant part as falling under "where

2) The second imposition of the amount borne by a person who can be deemed to have already paid the amount borne by a person for the installation of waterworks is illegal as it is double imposition. Since the Plaintiff did not directly complete the construction of waterworks within the instant district and paid all the amount borne by the amount borne by the Plaintiff, the instant disposition imposing the amount borne by the Defendant on the Plaintiff is not only a violation of the Water Supply and Waterworks Installation Act and the instant ordinances, but also the order for the performance to a person who did not have the obligation to pay the amount borne by the person who did not have the obligation to pay the amount

3) According to Article 71 of the Water Supply and Waterworks Installation Act, where a housing is constructed on the housing complex after a housing complex was constructed, a local government, a waterworks business operator, can impose an amount borne by an industrial complex developer, and where no additional water supply facilities, other than water supply facilities, are installed in the course of newly building a housing unit after the construction of the housing unit, a housing construction business operator, a local government, can impose an amount borne by an industrial complex developer, and through the construction of a new housing unit, if no additional water supply facilities, other than water supply facilities, are installed in the course of new construction of the housing unit after the construction of the housing unit, the main constructor shall not impose an amount borne by the burden. Even if the construction of a new apartment is subject to subparagraph 1 of attached Table 1 related to Article 4(1)1

4) Even if the instant disposition was imposed on the Plaintiff as the implementer of the Jeonju Innovation Urban Development Project, it is unlawful to retroactively apply the instant Ordinance.

5) If the applicable law of the provision of this case, which is the basis of the disposition of this case, is Article 138 of the Local Autonomy Act, and the burden borne by the Defendant is considered to be the facility contributions in substance, the provision of this case provides that the provision of this Ordinance shall be excluded from the scope of delegation under Article 138 of the Local Autonomy Act, which is a superior law, by allowing the Plaintiff who does not fall under the “person who is particularly benefiting from residents” to impose the facility contributions, and is null and void, and the disposition of this case based on the invalid Ordinance is unlawful.

6) Articles 4(1)3, 5(1)2, 5(1)2, 2, and 3 of the instant Ordinance cannot serve as the basis for the instant disposition. Even if the instant disposition was based on the foregoing provisions, Article 4(1)3 of the instant Ordinance is invalid as it enacted matters not delegated under Article 71 of the Water Supply and Waterworks Installation Act, which are superior statutes.

B. The defendant's assertion

1) The new construction of the instant apartment, resulting in the construction of the instant apartment, the Defendant imposed an amount borne by the Defendant according to the construction cost required for the instant construction. The construction of the instant apartment does not constitute a case where the construction of the instant apartment causes new construction and extension of future water-supply facilities.

2) Of the project cost of the instant water supply system construction related to the Jeonju and Jeonju Innovation Urban Development Project (hereinafter “the instant water supply system construction”) the total project cost of KRW 36,675,00,00 out of the total project cost of KRW 10,153,00,000, the remainder of the construction cost of KRW 10,000,000 was paid by the Defendant. The Defendant was a plan to cover KRW 3,305,00,000 from the Plaintiff out of the water supply project cost of the instant water supply system with the burden of borne by the Defendant, but the Defendant did not complete the instant water supply system construction project with the burden of KRW 3,305,00 from the Plaintiff on the ground of the burden of borne by the Defendant. The instant disposition does not constitute double imposition.

3) Under Article 71 of the Water Supply and Waterworks Installation Act, the Plaintiff newly constructs a house after a water supply facility is installed.

In the process, where additional water supply facilities, other than water supply facilities, are not installed, an organization of local autonomy can not impose an amount borne by the burden on the local government housing construction business operator, but Article 71 of the Water Supply and Waterworks Installation Act only provides that the person who caused the cost of the waterworks construction may bear all or part of the expenses incurred in performing the waterworks construction, and the former and the complete city development business is governed by the Ordinance of this case as a large project.

4) At the time of the instant water supply project, the Defendant did not reach an agreement on the burden borne by the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff at the time of the instant water supply project. The instant disposition was made in accordance with Article 4(1)3, Article 5(1)2, attached Table 2, and 3 of the instant Ordinance, which provides that each of the burden borne by the Plaintiff upon the Plaintiff’s application for water supply shall be imposed in a successive order, following the enactment of the instant Ordinance on May 31, 2012.

(c) Relevant statutes;

As shown in the attached Form.

D. Determination

1) Determination on the illegality of the instant disposition

A) The Defendant stated that the instant disposition was based on Article 4(1)3 of the instant Ordinance. If the instant disposition was based on Article 4(1)3 of the instant Ordinance, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the regulatory structure, form, language, and text of the relevant statutes, and the evidence and the entire purport of oral argument, the Defendant’s legal basis is not recognized to impose the burden on the Plaintiff on the Plaintiff. Thus, without examining the remainder of the Plaintiff’s assertion, the instant disposition is unlawful.

(1) Article 71 of the Water Supply and Waterworks Installation Act provides that "A waterworks business operator may have a person who has contributed to the causes of costs incurred in performing the waterworks construction work (including a person who has caused new installation or extension, etc. of waterworks by installing facilities using a large number of tap water, such as housing complex and industrial facilities, etc.), or a person who has contributed to the business of damaging waterworks or who has engaged in the business of operating waterworks bear all or part of the costs necessary for the relevant waterworks construction work, the maintenance of waterworks facilities, or the prevention of damage to waterworks."

Article 65 (1) and (3) of the Enforcement Decree of the Water Supply and Waterworks Installation Act; and "water supply business operator" shall provide a person who causes expenses incurred in performing waterworks works under Article 71 (1) of the Water Supply and Waterworks Installation Act (water, such as a housing complex or industrial facility)

If a waterworks business operator intends to have an amount borne by an amount borne by an amount borne by an amount borne by an amount borne by an amount to be borne by the amount borne by the amount borne by the amount to be borne by the person responsible for the calculation, method of payment, etc. In such cases, if an agreement is not reached, the amount borne by the amount to be borne may be determined in consideration of the expenses incurred in the construction and extension of the waterworks, construction expenses incurred in the restoration of the waterworks, washing of the waterworks facilities, etc. In such cases, the amount borne by the relevant amount to be borne by the amount equivalent to the charges for tap water that cannot be used due to the washing of the waterworks facilities, the expenses incurred in the use of water-supply vehicles due to a fraction, the expenses incurred in road recovery, the expenses incurred in the prevention of road ice, the expenses incurred in public relations, etc.

In light of the legislative form, structure, language, etc. of the aforementioned relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, it is reasonable that a waterworks business operator may impose a "expenses incurred in the construction or extension of waterworks" on a person who incurred expenses incurred in performing waterworks construction (including a person who incurred the construction or extension of waterworks by installing facilities using a large number of tap water, such as a housing complex and industrial facility, etc.) on a waterworks business operator. Therefore, even if a person who installed a facility using a large number of tap water is a person who installed the facility, the costs incurred in the construction of the waterworks shall not be imposed on a waterworks business operator if the existing facility is used only for the waterworks installed and the installation or extension of the waterworks is not carried out, and there is no ground to record the cost-bearing for the construction of the waterworks business solely on the ground that the existing waterworks is used.

(2) Under the interpretation of the Enforcement Decree of the Water Supply and Waterworks Installation Act and the Enforcement Decree of the Water Supply and Waterworks Installation Act, the ordinances of local governments can only set the detailed criteria necessary for calculating the cost of the existing waterworks within the scope of the "object and scope of additional fences" under the Water Supply and Waterworks Installation Act, and the "basic criteria for calculating the cost of the water supply" under the Enforcement Decree of the Water Supply and Waterworks Installation Act, but cannot set a new imposition requirement beyond the criminal intent prescribed by the higher law. However, Article 4 (1) 3 of the Ordinance of this case provides that when the water is supplied to buildings located within the water supply area, etc., the construction cost of the existing waterworks shall be imposed on the user of the existing waterworks, even though the cost of the waterworks for the installation or extension of the waterworks was not incurred, the user shall bear the cost of the existing waterworks as the burden of the water supply. This is not recognized since it deviates from the scope of delegation prescribed by the Enforcement Decree of the Water Supply and Waterworks Installation Act and the Enforcement Decree of the Water Supply and Waterworks Act.

B) Meanwhile, if the Defendant, as alleged by the Plaintiff, took the instant disposition on the ground of Article 4(1)1 of the Ordinance, as alleged by the Plaintiff, the instant disposition is deemed to have already been governed by the said Act solely on the following grounds.

(1) At the time of the instant disposition, the Defendant calculated the amount borne by the person responsible for water supply according to the criteria for calculation prescribed in subparagraph 3(a) rather than Article 4(1)1 of the instant Ordinance at the time of the instant disposition. As seen earlier, the instant disposition is calculated by applying the erroneous criteria for calculation in violation of the instant Ordinance.

(2) Article 4(1)1 of the instant Ordinance provides that the person who incurred the construction or extension, etc. of waterworks imposes the relevant construction cost on the person who incurred the construction or extension, etc. of waterworks. The instant disposition was imposed on the basis of the installation cost, etc. of waterworks installed in the existing waterworks, and it is not imposed on the construction or extension cost of waterworks. Thus, the said Ordinance cannot be the basis for such disposition.

2) Determination as to whether a defect is serious

A) Relevant legal principles

In order for a defective administrative disposition to be null and void as a matter of course, the defect must be one of the significant parts of the relevant laws and regulations, and should be objectively apparent. Thus, in order for an administrative disposition to be null and void as a matter of course by applying an invalid municipal ordinance which is unlawful by an administrative agency, the provision concerns the important parts of the administrative disposition. As a result, the provision concerns the important parts of the administrative disposition, which led to a defect in an important part of the administrative disposition. Moreover, the illegality of the provision is so objectively obvious as to the extent that there is no possibility of dispute over the interpretation, and the defect of the administrative disposition accordingly ought to be objectively obvious (see Supreme Court Decision 2007Du26285, Oct. 29, 2009).

B) Determination

Article 4 (1) 3 of the Ordinance of this case, which is the basis of the disposition of this case, is not effective as being enacted without delegation under Article 71 of the Water Supply and Waterworks Installation Act and Article 65 of the Enforcement Decree of the Water Supply and Waterworks Installation Act as seen earlier. The plaintiff is a housing construction business operator who has filed an application for water supply with respect to the buildings constructed by the plaintiff, and the "the user of tap water" is not "the user of tap water". Thus, even under Article 4 (1) 3 of the Ordinance of this case which is illegal and invalid, it is objectively obvious that the construction of multi-family housing is not subject to the charge. Even under Article 4 (1) 1 of the Ordinance of this case, even if the construction of multi-family housing does not fall under subparagraph 2 of attached Table 1 of the Ordinance of this case, in light of the objective apparent that the construction of multi-family housing does not fall under the facilities of the charge-bearing entity, it shall be deemed that the construction of multi-family housing is null

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Lee Chang-chul

Judges Han Jin-hee

Judges Kang Jae-chul

【Related Acts and Subordinate Statutes】

Water Supply and Waterworks Installation

Article 38 (Provisions) (1) Any general waterworks business operator shall obtain approval from the authorizing agency before commencing the supply of tap water by prescribing the expenses for the construction of tap water rates, the expenses for water supply facilities and other terms and conditions for the supply of tap water, as prescribed by Presidential Decree, and the same shall apply to any light that intends to modify the approved matters: Provided, That where the waterworks business operator is a local government, it shall be prescribed by Municipal Ordinance of the relevant local government.

(2) Any general waterworks business operator and any authorizing agency under the main sentence of paragraph (1) shall ensure that all expenses incurred in installing the relevant waterworks may be recovered by the service fees for tap water in determining the terms and conditions for the supply of tap water or approving therefor.

Article 70 (Bearing Expenses Incurred in Installing Waterworks) The expenses incurred in installing waterworks (excluding water supply facilities) shall be borne by a waterworks business operator.

(1) A waterworks business operator may require a person who has incurred expenses for the construction of waterworks (including a person who has caused the installation or extension, etc. of waterworks by installing facilities using many tap water, such as housing complexes and industrial facilities, etc.), or a person who has operated a business or performs an act that damages waterworks, to fully or partially bear expenses incurred in the construction of the relevant waterworks, the maintenance of waterworks facilities, or the prevention of damage to waterworks.

(2) Standards for the calculation and collection of charges under paragraph (1) and other necessary matters shall be determined by Presidential Decree.

(3) Charges under paragraph (1) may be used only for expenses incurred by the Corporation, such as the creation, extension, relocation, remodeling, and renovation of waterworks.

【Enforcement Decree of the Water Supply and Waterworks Installation

Article 65 (Amount Borne by Responsible Persons) (1) Where a waterworks business operator intends to impose an amount borne by borne by a person (including a person who has installed facilities using a large number of tap water, such as a housing complex and industrial facility, and has caused new installation, expansion, etc. of waterworks facilities) who has incurred expenses incurred in performing waterworks works pursuant to Article 71 (1) of the Act, he/she shall consult in advance with the liable person on the calculation basis of an amount borne by responsible for borne by a person and method of payment, etc. under Article 71 (2) of the Act. In such cases, where no consultation is held, a waterworks business operator may determine

(2) Where a waterworks business operator intends to impose charges on an amount borne by a person responsible for water works, etc. pursuant to paragraph (1), he/she shall calculate the expenses incurred in water works, etc. and notify the person who has paid charges of the amount, payment deadline

(3) The amount borne by burden-bearing entities under paragraph (1) shall be the sum of the following expenses:

1. Expenses incurred in newly installing and expanding waterworks;

2. Construction expenses incurred in restoring facilities to their original state;

3. The amount of money equivalent to service charges for tap water which has become unusable due to washing, etc. of waterworks;

4. Expenses for water supply teas due to the fractional suspension (shortages);

5. Expenses for road restoration and the prevention of road ices;

6. Expenses for vehicles used and personnel mobilized for restoration works;

7. Other expenses, etc. for public relations.

(4) Where a waterworks business operator intends to have a person who runs a business or engages in an act that causes damage to waterworks bear the original charge pursuant to Article 71 (1) of the Act, he/she shall calculate expenses incurred in the water line and maintenance of the waterworks or expenses incurred in installing snows to prevent damage and notify the person who has paid the charge of the amount, payment deadline and place of payment by entering the amount of

(5) The amount borne by burden-bearing entities under paragraph (4) shall be the sum of the following expenses:

1. The amount equivalent to the charge for tap water which has leaked or become unusable due to the damage, etc. to the water services facilities;

(6) Detailed standards necessary for the calculation of expenses under paragraphs (3) and (5) shall be prescribed by municipal ordinance of the relevant local government.

/Ordinance on the Calculation, Collection, etc. of Charges on Water Supply at the Jeonju

Article 1 (Purpose) The purpose of this Ordinance is to prescribe matters necessary for the calculation and imposition of charges on water services facilities in Jeonju under Article 71 of the Water Supply and Waterworks Installation Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") and Article 65 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Decree").

Article 2 (Definitions) The definitions of terms used in this Ordinance shall be as follows:

1. The term "charges borne by borne persons" means the causes of the occurrence of expenses incurred in performing waterworks works or other acts;

It shall be classified as follows as the person who bears the expenses required by him/her:

(a) New installation or enlargement works, etc. of waterworks by installing facilities using a large quantity of tap water;

If necessary, the costs required for the construction shall be borne by the person who caused the construction.

(water-using facilities) Future waterworks by installing existing water-using facilities;

(b) include the cases which cause new or expandedness.

(b) Alteration, relocation, repair, removal, etc. of waterworks installed due to other construction works or other acts;

If necessary, the cost shall be borne by the person who provided the cause of the construction.

(c) Where waterworks is damaged or leakages have occurred due to defects in waterworks works, the number of water services facilities resulting therefrom;

A business operator or an offender shall bear the costs of vessel and maintenance or the costs of installing facilities necessary to prevent damage.

In addition, it is required to impose.

Article 4 (Subject and Scope of Impositions) (1) The amount borne by burden-bearing entities referred to in subparagraph 1 of Article 2 shall be classified as follows:

1. A waterworks business operator's capability to supply waterworks by installing facilities which use a large number of tap water, such as a housing complex and industrial facility;

Water-supply stations, water-supply stations, drainage stations, pressure stations, transmission and drainage facilities, etc., by causing water demand on the water.

Where a person who incurred new establishment, extension, etc., imposes the relevant construction cost on such person;

2. Transmission and drainage of conduits, etc. to supply new tap water to buildings, etc. located outside the water supply zone.

Where construction of facilities is required, the expenses required for the construction of existing waterworks and the relevant flooded city;

Where the cost of construction required for the new establishment or extension of the snow imposes on the user of the tap water;

3. Waterworks facilities existing in cases where tap water is supplied to buildings, etc. located within a water supply district;

When construction expenses are charged to persons who use tap water (the increase of a building, renovation, etc.)

In such cases, charges borne by borne persons shall be imposed only on increased capacity, including cases of increase.

Article 5 (Standards for Calculation of Charges) (1) The calculation of charges borne by borne persons referred to in Article 4 (1) shall be governed by the following standards:

1. The subjects of and standards for burden-bearing entities under Article 4 (1) 1 shall apply to large-scale development projects;

[1] The calculation shall be based on [1]

2. Article 4 (1) 2 and 3 shall apply in cases where the amount borne by borne by persons under Article 4 (1) 2 and 3 is not a large

The target and criteria shall be calculated in accordance with attached Table 2.

3. In the case of subparagraph 1, the former Mayor shall be a person responsible for the burden-bearing (hereinafter referred to as the "person scheduled to provide the cause") at the time of permission or permission.

(including) prepare and impose an agreement and an agreement (attached Table 3): Provided, That after completing consultation on an implementation plan for a construction project,

If it is deemed that the Do Convention is delayed or it is difficult to enter into an agreement unilaterally before the commencement thereof.

may be imposed.

4. In the case of subparagraph 2, the submission of data necessary for the calculation of charges borne by the former city and agreement thereon may be requested.

A cause provider shall submit it without delay.

5. Water supply facilities, drainage pipes, etc. due to water supply to the location of a cause provider, to the business area.

Additional project costs shall be borne by a cause provider.

6. Expenses incurred in applying for water supply, other than the charges to be borne by the person who caused the water, shall be imposed under the Water Supply Ordinance of the Jeonju-si.

(c)

7. Article 6 of the Enforcement Rule of the Act on Contracts to Which a Local Government Is a Party.

Pursuant to the determination of the estimated price by cost accounting of the provisions of this section, the preparation of design documents and the completion inspection expenses

shall include the fees of the Commission.

[Attachment 1]

Standards for calculation of burden-generating charges for large-scale development projects (related to Article 4 (1) 1)

In cases falling under Article 4 (1) 1:

1. Projects subject to imposition: Projects that are consulted upon authorization of development plans and implementation plans;

A person shall be appointed.

(a) Development projects under the Housing Site Development Promotion Act;

(c) Development projects under the Act on the Development and Operation of Logistics Facilities;

(c) Urban development projects under the Urban Development Act;

(d) Housing site preparation projects under the Housing Act;

(e) Complex development project under the Act on Special Measures for D, etc.;

(f) Other large-scale projects, etc. recognized by the Mayor.

2. The term "unit project cost" means the total project cost for water services facilities to be supplied within the relevant project district;

The term "project cost per square meter for tap water" means a project cost per facility capacity.

(a) Unit project cost shall be a waterworks project to supply water within the relevant project district (the prime facility, water-purification facility, water-purification facility, and water pipes);

Project costs per square meter for tap water for snow, drainage facilities)

(c) Where there is no new installation or extension of waterworks business to supply the relevant business district or it is difficult to classify the relevant business;

per unit project costs for facilities which have been recently constructed if simply causing water demand;

may be calculated. In such cases, it shall be calculated on the basis of the unit project cost publicly notified.

(c) The unit project cost for the new and expanded drainage facilities shall be covered by the actual construction cost, but before the commencement of the construction work;

If the construction cost is not known due to the reason, the design budget and the estimated amount shall be determined.

3. The quantity of tap water used by the business subject to imposition shall be completed to the number of persons calculated based on the business plan or design plan of the relevant business.

The amount shall be calculated by multiplying the maximum daily water supply per person in the scheduled year (LPCD) by the estimated amount of water supply.

(a) The maximum daily water supply = the additional coefficient of the daily water supply x of the volume of the x of the 1st day per person;

(c)For employees and Gus, as of the scheduled date of completion, and for residential facilities, used for household use;

For non-resident facilities, the quantity of residential facilities shall be based on the quantity used by each business type of the relevant facilities.

(c)The daily volume of water supply per person and the coefficient of addition shall apply mutatis mutandis to the basic plan for the maintenance of water supply at Jeonju.

4. The term "additional project cost" means the transmission and drainage time of conduits, etc. in order to supply tap water to the relevant project zone, building, etc.

actual cost of construction, including incidental cost of the snow.

5. The amount borne by burden-bearing entities, calculated on the basis of the waterworks whose construction has been completed recently, shall be published by the Statistics Korea in December each year.

It shall be borne by the burden of borne by the producer in the relevant year by multiplying the annual producer inflation rate in the year. In addition, by the time of the agreement,

The inflation rate may be accumulated in a cumulative manner during the Do period.

[Attachment 2]

Other standards for calculation of burden-bearing (related to Article 4 (1) 2 and 3)

In the case of Article 4 (1) 2 and 3, 1. Net assets = (property of operation facilities + assets under construction + Cumulative donations) - [facility contributions and construction charges]

Cumulativex (1 - Cumulative depreciation / Acquisition value of assets in operation facilities)

(a) The assets of operation facilities shall include land, standing timber, buildings, structures, machinery, and vehicle transportation on the balance sheet of the relevant year;

The amount obtained by subtracting the total sum of depreciation from value, such as half-gu, public machinery fixtures, other household facilities assets, etc.

(c)

(b)Other available facility assets mean donated assets such as watersupply facilities.

(c)net assets shall be compiled on the basis of the settlement of accounts for the special accounts for waterworks projects at the end of the preceding year.

2. Allotted share in the old light = Net assets 】 Distribution rate by old light.

(a) The method for calculating the utility model contributions shall apply mutatis mutandis to the apportionments;

(b) Distribution rate by Gu or landscape = Complement number by Gu or landscape / Total sum of drop number by Gu or landscape;

(c) Rab number by luscis = Correction coefficient (official Sponis) x water transmission installed in luscis;

※윌리암헤이즌공식 : Q = 0 . 27583 * 0 * 0² . 63 * 0 . 54 ( ㎡ / S )

(d) The transfer of existing water supply may be published by the City Mayor in consideration of the current status of installation.

3. Shares to be borne by the person who caused the contamination = (shared by the Gu and the transmission by the Gu and the Gu) x realization rate.

(a) The share of pawned hall = the share of the facility contributions by Gu and Gu/ the transfer by Gu and Gu.

(c) Realization rate: The increase in prices and the burden of new water supply applications due to the introduction of charges borne by borne by responsible persons;

The ratio taking into account the contributions to the facilities in order to alleviate them;

(c) Calculation of the realization rate: A person who has contributed to and caused the local government's facilities of which the size of Jeonju and population is similar.

The average of charges shall be 100% in comparison with charges. Within the extent of the percentage, Jeonju City.

The realization rate shall be calculated on the basis of the amount of charges borne by the Gu for each year.

(d) The realizing rate calculated may also be adjusted by the mayor in consideration of the economy of ordinary people and local prices.

4. Where there is a change in the realizing rate, the Mayor may publish it every year in consultation with the Council: Provided, That in question;

When no year is announced, it shall be based on the previous year and the recent year standards.

5. The term "additional project costs" means the costs of supplying tap water to buildings, etc. located outside the water supply zone and the water supply zone.

shall refer to the expenses incurred in the actual construction of transmission and drainage facilities, such as conduits, etc. In such cases, the detailed standards shall be the water supply facilities on the Jeonju.

The Guidelines for the Management of Water Supply and Waterworks Works shall be in accordance with the Guidelines.