logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.02.10 2016고합169
특수공무집행방해치상등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 21, 2016, the Defendant driven a C Saturdays car at a distance of about 10km from the distance of about 10km to the forward three-distance of the Round Sports Center located in the Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, Goyang-si, Goyang-si under the influence of alcohol content 0.082% among blood transfusions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the circumstances of driving at home;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) (excluding punishment) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. Scope of punishment by law: A fine not exceeding three million won;

2. Determination of sentence: A fine of a fine of three million won is imposed as ordered in consideration of various sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of a crime, and circumstances after a crime, etc.

The acquittal portion

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On July 21, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of special official duties, even though he received a demand for stopping from D, F, and E while driving a ice car under the influence of alcohol on the front side of the light underground roadway, as set forth in paragraph (1), while driving the ice car on the front side of the street, as long as he/she was in the front of the light underground roadway, the Defendant continued to go through the above D, Japan, and E without complying therewith, and continued to go through the police officer and continued to go through the above D, E, and it was demanded from the Inspector F, who was under the influence of alcohol at the point of regulating the drinking of the light underground roadway in front of the vehicle under the influence of alcohol. However, the Defendant was demanded by the police officer to stop the above F, making the left left turn, and subsequently, prevented the above D and E from driving the front street of the Defendant’s vehicle.

arrow