logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2011.01.27 2010고정513
업무방해
Text

Defendant

A A Fines 2,00,000 won, Defendant B’s fine 1,50,000 won, Defendant C’s fine 1,00,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A as the vice-chairperson of the F Hotel Trade Union (hereinafter referred to as the "Trade Union") and Defendant B as the head of the education and publicity department of the above trade union, Defendant C as the chairperson of the Gran Association, and Defendant D as the head of the above Gran Women's Bureau.

1. The joint criminal conduct of Defendant A and B from February 2009 to the same year

3. F hotel (hereinafter referred to as " hotel") ;

In February 2, 2009, as part of the management rationalization measure against management difficulties, the labor union decided that the facility team be removed and 15 employees of the facility team be dismissed.

During the period between around 07:30 to 08:30 on March 11, 2009 and around 16:45 to 18:10 on the delivery of the F hotel emotional in front of the Jeju-si and the hotel suitable for the above chairperson of the labor union, the Defendants, along with 30 members of the above labor union, such as H, chief vice-chairperson I, the secretary general, J, L, M, N,O, P, Q, Q, R, T, and T, demanding the withdrawal, etc. of the outsourcing of the facility team, using the loudspeaker attached to the vehicle located at the headquarters of U Jeju-si District, causing excessive noise, such as creating a crypt and collective relief, or raising or spreading labor, from February 27, 2009, as well as causing excessive noise from around February 27, 209.

3. From the end of 23.2, while carrying out one-person pocketet demonstration and assembly in front of the hotel sentiments, as shown in the attached list of crimes (1), the hotel reservation was canceled due to the cancellation of the hotel reservation, the entry of an additional reservation, or the withdrawal of visitors from the hotel business by continuously creating an excessive noise by using loudspeakers, creating a group of reliefs, etc.

As a result, the Defendants in collusion with the above H and union members, thereby obstructing the hotel business of the victim F hotel by force.

2. The defendant A and B's joint criminal conduct (Interference with the business of June 2009).

arrow