logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2017.03.10 2016고단422
범인도피등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, even though he was well aware of the fact that Defendant B destroyed the gas station’s liquid content, Defendant A destroyed the gas station’s liquid content while driving the gas station from Defendant B

The statement is different. On the other hand, it will be possible to pay a maximum amount of the damage agreement and to provide a fine instead.

“At the request of the purport, the police station has received a false request to surrenders to the police station.”

Defendant

A은 2016. 6. 25. 12:18 경 공주시 백제문화로 2148-15에 있는 공주 경찰서에서, “ 내가 2016. 6. 8. 03:52 경 D K3 승용차를 운전하였고, 주유하기 위해 E 주유소에 갔다가 주유기가 작동이 안되어 홧김에 주유기 액정을 주먹으로 1회 쳐 부쉈다.

“A false statement.”

As a result, the defendant got the defendant B to escape from committing a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

2. Defendant B

A. On June 8, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the E gas station located in F at the Sinju on F on June 8, 2016; (b) on the ground that, in order to put oil into DK3 automobiles, the Defendant stopped on one side of the week’s abandonment; and (c) on the car ledger, the Defendant, on the ground that it was dispared by the driver’s seat while it was dispared, it would be at least once a week to the right side of the alcoholic beverage owned by the Victim G; and (d) destroyed the alcoholic beverage so that the repair cost equivalent to KRW 180,000 would be exceeded.

B. Around 03:52 on June 8, 2016, Defendant B driven DK3 automobiles from the front side of H in the vicinity of the oil station in the Sinju City F without a driver’s license to the third distance located in the Sinju City, the Sinju-si, the Sinju-si, the Sinju-si, the Sinju-si.

(c)

On June 8, 2016, 03:52 around 03:52, 2016, Defendant B also destroyed a liquor alcohol in E stations located in F, and was driving DK3 Motor Vehicles, and Defendant A “B was driving on behalf of DD without a license before leaving, while driving it on behalf of D and damaged the level of the liquor alcohol.”

There is a difference in the statement to the police. If so, there is a consensus.

arrow