logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 01. 28. 선고 2015두54049 판결
(심리불속행) 원고가 중도금으로 지급하였다는 금원에는 잔금이 포함됨[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2015Nu31550

Title

(Republic Trial) The balance is included in the amount that the Plaintiff paid as part payments.

Summary

(Summary of the Judgment of the Supreme Court) The Plaintiff’s receipt and No. 1 are insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff paid the amount of the receipt to the purchaser on the same day, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant is clear that it falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Inspection of Final Appeals and therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

Related statutes

Article 96 of the Income Tax Act (Calculation of Necessary Expenses in Transfer Income)

arrow