1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the part against the plaintiff falling under the order to revoke below shall be revoked.

Defendant.

1. The reasoning for this case by the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (excluding part 3. conclusion), Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, as well as the submission or addition of part of the judgment of the court of first instance, as set forth in the following paragraph (2).

(hereinafter the meaning of the terms used in the table is the same as the judgment of the court of first instance). 2. the term "unlawfully using the support fund" in Part 2, which is used or added in the table 2, shall be read as "non-use of the support fund", the term "influence" in Part 3, as "influence", and the term "out-to-door recommending person" in Part 6, as "out-to-door recommending director".

Part 11 to 4 under the 3rd Schedule shall be deleted, and the 4th 3rd 3rd "(4)" shall be read as "3)".

After the "No. 14 Evidence" in Part 11 of Part 5, "A No. 27" was added, "the representative director is for business use" was added, "the last 15th "the fact that it was received" was added, "the last 15th "the fact that it was received", and "the deliberation and resolution on the expenditure budget, including the purchase price for the instant car, was completed on December 11, 2013)" was changed to "the representative" in the same act.

The 6th parallel 6 to 7th parallel 4th parallel shall be followed as follows:

In the case of the installment payment of this case, which was repaid with the 2nd car, first, the car of this case, which was scrapped by the plaintiff for the previous representative director, can be seen as falling under the "house, equipment, etc. necessary for the operation of facilities except land and buildings" which can be acquired as non-designated support payment, and it is clear that the installment of this case is the expenses paid for the purchase of the car of this case, and it is not an exceptional method to raise all or part of the purchase amount through installment financing today.