logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.01.09 2018누39821
요양급여불승인처분취소
Text

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. On November 2, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition to grant medical care benefits to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The reasons why this part of the disposition is stated by the court are as follows. This part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (from No. 2 to No. 20). Thus, this part of the reasoning is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(hereinafter the meaning of the abbreviationd language used in this context is the same as the judgment of the first instance). The second parallel 3 of the second parallel 14:30 shall be applied "16:30".

The second parallel " October 30, 2015" in the 8th parallel shall be construed as " October 18, 2014", and the third parallel " October 27, 2014" as " October 27, 2015."

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion, the relevant statutes, and this part of the facts of recognition are the same as the relevant part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance (Articles 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, inasmuch as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is identical to that of the relevant part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance (Articles 3 through 8, 12 through 16) in addition to the following:

The third side of the third side of the Act shall be subject to the 3rd side of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of the said Act.

The fourth 18 week's "4 weeks" shall be added to "12 weeks".

After the 5th to 3th 4th, “the Plaintiff was on September 3, 2014, prior to the day on which the instant injury or disease occurred (from 15:00 to 24:00), the Plaintiff was on duty at D around 09:0 and was on duty to display and sell memorial futures sets until 24:00.”

Part 5 of the 10th page "O. 4, 2004" shall be applied to "O. 4, 2005".

Part 6 "A 8" is used as "cryptives and Guto," and the part 11 is added to "A 18:48 blood pressure 150/90 on September 4, 2014" to "A 2" under the part 19 and 8 of the 6 pages.

arrow