1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasons for the entry of this case by the court of first instance concerning this case are as follows: (a) to write or add part of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in paragraph (2); and (b) to add new arguments by the plaintiff at the court of first instance as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, other than adding the judgment as stated in paragraph (3) above; and (c) to this case, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2

(hereinafter the meaning of the terms used in this case is the same as the judgment of the court of first instance). 2. The second reason is added to the term "housing redevelopment project" (hereinafter referred to as the "project of this case") after the third reason.

Then, the phrase “(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2014Du15528, Nov. 26, 2015)” is added.

The "Appraiser" in Part 19 of the 4th page shall be added to "Appraiser of the first instance trial".

The second part of the "F, Selection" portion of the "F," which is the second part of the "F," shall be applied to other factors correction data, since the appropriateness is recognized in light of the neighboring transaction cases (G, H, I, J, K, K, and V).

The following shall be added to the table below the fifth Schedule:

In addition, according to the statement in Gap evidence No. 11, the plaintiff submitted an appraisal report on the land and buildings of this case to the plaintiff during the party trial proceeding, the plaintiff is an friendly appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "friendly appraisal corporation").

A) In the appraisal report, after applying the officially announced land price standard method as to the land of this case, the appraisal report also selects the land of this case as L, which is the same as the comparison standard for the appraisal of this case as seen earlier.

Although the appropriateness of the trial price was examined by applying the transaction comparison method, other appraisal methods than the cost method to the building in this case, and the market price calculated by the so-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called O-Do appraisal corporation according to the transaction comparison method to the land in this case is also viewed as follows.