logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원서산지원 2020.08.12 2019고단255
사서명위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes in the 2019 Highest 255, 2019 Highest 333 cases, and by imprisonment for eight months, 2020 Highest 144, 2020 Highest 486, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On April 3, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court on April 3, 2019, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 11, 2019.

"2019 Highest 255"

1. On September 25, 2018, the Defendant was driving a F K5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.078% without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of approximately 1km from C in Seosan-si, Seosan-si to E in Seosan-si, Seosan-si, and around 03:11 on September 25, 2018.

2. On September 25, 2018, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act, around 03:2, on the road located in Seosan-si, Seosan-si, G District G District H at the Seosan Police Station G District H, in order to have his/her drinking control over the drinking, and to have his/her drinking and driving without a license known as if he/she had been aware of the fact of driving under the influence of his/her drinking and driving under the influence of his/her drinking and driving without a license. The Defendant illegally used his/her name and resident registration number by leaving his/her personal information on the water drinking of the above H.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, signed I in the “vehicle’s confirmation column of the driver of the notification of the result of the influence of drinking driving conducted by the superintendent of the police station,” signed I in the “name column of the report on the circumstances of the driver with the name column of the driver with the name column and affixed I a forged document to the above H who is unaware of the fact.

Accordingly, the defendant forged another person's signature for the purpose of exercising his right, and exercised it.

Around April 30, 2018, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The parents who want to open a mobile phone would oppose the victimJ, who was aware of it in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon. In lieu of the mobile phone device under the four names, the Defendant would not cause damage by paying all the cost of the mobile phone and the fee for the use of the mobile phone in order to use the mobile phone instead of the mobile phone device.”

However, the defendant has opened a mobile phone device in the name of the victim to another person.

arrow