logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2018.08.30 2018나20935
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against Defendant F among the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff F is subject to the revoked part.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Establishment of the instant company and the status of the parties 1) Joint Defendant D in the first instance trial (hereinafter “D”).

() From November 2013 to Cheongju-si, H, one of its de facto spouse, was registered as the representative director in its name, and the name was changed to C Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co., Ltd. (S Co., Ltd. on August 29, 2012) on November 21, 2013 and December 4, 2013.

hereinafter referred to as “instant company”

(2) While operating the company, the company established the Daegu branch office of the company of this case around April 2014. (2) The company of this case was a "Planning real estate company" operated solely with real estate resale marginal profit. After purchasing the land, D determined the sale price at ordinary price and purchase ancillary expenses by adding sales allowances to the employees, and is in charge of the business of notifying the possibility of development, sale conditions, sales price, etc. of the land to each director, business office, etc. who is an executive officer of the company of this case. The officers of the company of this case provided the employees of the company with education about the possibility of development, sale conditions, sale method, counseling method, and explain the possibility of development, sale conditions, etc. of the relevant land to the purchaser, and then divide the land and enter into a sales contract after selling the relevant land and concluding a sales contract.

3) A is the substantial representative of the instant company, and Defendant F is the director of the instant company, and Defendant E was promoted to the head of the Daegu branch office of the instant company (the senior head of the office).

Co-Defendant G of the first instance trial (hereinafter referred to as “G”).

(B) The Daegu branch office of the instant company is the director of the Daegu branch office. (B) D, around April 2014, at the office of the Daegu branch office of the instant company, around April 2014, "I land (hereinafter referred to as "I land") for the officers of the said company, Defendant E, G, etc., and "I land (hereinafter referred to as "I land") of the instant company."

Section 2. of this case, J-Land et al.

arrow