1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion: (a) the Plaintiff, a Korean national residing in Korea in August 2009, entered Korea through Korea on August 23, 2013, entered Korea, had received education on the purchase and sale of land through C, a Korean national residing in Korea on August 2013; and (b) the employees of the Defendant company, such as C, D, and E, during that process, shall explosion. Monetary reform in the future. The Korean won value falls short of 1/100. The Korean won value falls short of 2/100. The two Jeju-do is the first Jeju-do, and the “land purchase” is the Hong Kong-do region. The Government provided education with the content that “the Defendant’s business is supported; (c) the Plaintiff’s business is supported by the Government; and (d) the Plaintiff’s purchase price constitutes KRW 960,579,797,579,769,7967,000,000 won of forest land sold by the Defendant on September 23, 2013.

2. Determination: The plaintiff does not accept the plaintiff's assertion that it was a "Fraud sale"; however, there is no affirmative evidence supporting that the defendant company entered into a contract by fraud or deception with respect to the value of the land in this case, possibility of development of surrounding areas, future investment gains, etc. (the prosecutor's office takes measures without suspicion on the ground that there is no evidence against the "Fraud" case that the plaintiff filed a complaint by the plaintiff, etc.)