1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion: (a) the Plaintiff, a Korean national residing in Korea in August 2007, who entered Korea in August 1, 2007, received education on the purchase and sale of land through C, a Korean national residing in Korea on August 17, 2013; and (b) the employees of the Defendant company, such as C, D, and E, in the process of opening the Defendant’s office for several days at the time when he visited the Defendant’s office; (c) the employees of the Defendant company, such as C, D, and E, shall explosion. In the future, the Korean won value falls short of 1/100; (d) the Korean won currency price falls short of 2/100; and (e) the “land purchase” of the Chinese people becomes Hong Kong-do. The Government shall support the Defendant’s business; (c) the Plaintiff’s share in the purchase and sale of land at the price 50/679/260,000,000 of the farmland at the time of purchase.

2. Determination: The plaintiff does not accept the plaintiff's assertion that it was a "Fraud sale"; however, there is no affirmative evidence supporting that the defendant company entered into a contract by fraud or deception with respect to the value of the land in this case, possibility of development of surrounding areas, future investment gains, etc. (the prosecutor's office takes measures without suspicion on the ground that there is no evidence against the "Fraud" case that the plaintiff filed a complaint by the plaintiff, etc.)