logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.04.11 2013가단180143
건물명도
Text

1. The Defendants deliver to the Plaintiff the real estate indicated in the attached list.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

3.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 26, 2012, the Plaintiff paid the purchase price on December 26, 2012 and acquired ownership by winning the real estate stated in paragraph (1) of the order (hereinafter “instant auction procedure”) in the Seoul Central District Court D, E, and F (Dual) auction procedure (hereinafter “instant auction procedure”).

B. The Defendants were acquired as co-ownership with GH, which is the former owner of the instant 502, between husband and wife, and on January 208

8. He/she acquired H shares and independently owned them;

(2) The lease agreement of October 5, 2004 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) and the lease agreement of October 5, 2004

(1) On January 3, 2005, Defendant C made a report on the right and demand for distribution in the instant auction procedure on the ground that it is a lessee who had completed a move-in report (the Defendant made a report on the right and demand for distribution three times in total at the instant auction procedure, and Defendant C made a demand for distribution on July 6, 2005, and on August 17, 2008 and May 14, 2010, Defendant B made a demand for distribution of KRW 130,000,000 as to the lease deposit, respectively.

(C) Around November 28, 2007, the Plaintiff filed an application for an order to deliver real estate against Defendant B, seeking delivery of the instant subparagraph 502, but was dismissed on May 9, 2013, since the preservation registration was completed on August 24, 2005, and thereafter, the Defendants obtained a fixed date on November 19, 2009. At around that time, several provisional seizures were registered until November 2008, including the creditor I’s claim amount of KRW 150,000,000,000, and the Plaintiff did not dispute over the establishment of the entire maximum debt amount of KRW 130,00,000,000, and KRW 13,000,000,000 from November 28, 2007.

2. The plaintiff asserted by the plaintiff and the defendant C in the name of the owner G and H.

arrow