1. Of the distribution schedule prepared on October 28, 2013 by the same court with respect to the case of voluntary auction of real estate W in this Court.

1. Basic facts

A. Party status 1) The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s building on the land outside X-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

(2) As to the instant real estate, the Defendants asserted a small lessee under the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act in the auction procedure regarding the instant real estate, and have filed a report on the right and demand for distribution with the executing court.

B. On April 26, 2012, the instant auction procedure and the instant distribution schedule 1) regarding the instant real estate, a voluntary decision to commence auction was rendered with W of the instant court on April 26, 2012, and the said procedure (hereinafter “instant auction procedure”).

(2) At the instant auction procedure, the Defendants asserted the small-sum lessee under the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act, reported the right and demanded a distribution, and the executing court prepared a distribution schedule with the following details on October 28, 2013.

(Non-related priority parts of this case are omitted; hereinafter “instant distribution schedule”). Defendant A 9,00,000 Defendant C 9,000,000 for Defendant E 1, 9,000,000,000 for Defendant Ah 9,000,000 for Defendant I 9,000,000,000 for Defendant I 9,000,000,000 for Defendant C 1, 9,000,000 for Defendant C 9,000,000,000 for Defendant Q Q Q 1,9,000,000,001 for Defendant C 9,000,000,000 for Defendant C 1,000,003 Plaintiff 2,530,680,587, 1,000 for each of the pleadings, the purport of each of the arguments is as follows.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion Defendants are tenants who are the most lessee or have no opposing power as stipulated in the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act, and each dividend amount against the Defendants should be deleted.

B. Determination 1: (a) comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings as indicated in the evidence Nos. 3-4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, and 24 of the evidence Nos. 3-1, the Defendants drafted a contract under which the Defendants rent part of the instant real estate from a personal identification planning to March 201 as KRW 15,000 or KRW 20,000 among the instant real estate from April 201 to March 201.