logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.05.07 2013고정649
관세법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

Defendant

A fails to pay the above fine; 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) is a company that exports by-products of domestic acid gold, such as originals and nearbys, to Vietnam and Thailand. Defendant A is the representative director of the Defendant Co., Ltd.

In order to export goods, no one shall report to the head of a customs office on the description, specification, quantity, and value of the relevant goods, and other matters prescribed by Presidential Decree, and, in such cases, he/she shall not export goods without meeting requirements for permission, approval, recommendations, certification

Animal products produced from animals, such as bones, bones, bamboo, etc., shall be subject to quarantine by quarantine officers as prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, if they intend to export the said products.

1. On March 8, 2012 without filing a quarantine report or issuance of an export quarantine certificate, Defendant A exported to the head of Pyeongtaek-si, without filing an export declaration or an export quarantine certificate, the product amounting to USD 17,688 by-products of domestic acid 24,920 km (the name of the reported product, FROZN MCE CET, EAT, freezing ducks), which is equivalent to USD 17,68,000, from around that time to January 11, 2013, the product amounting to USD 670,980 g, US$ 507,469 (the KRW 59,481,375) from around that time to around that time, was exported without filing an export declaration or an export quarantine certificate.

2. The Defendant Company, as indicated in paragraph (1), illegally exported the product amounting to USD 670,980 g, USD 507,469 ( KRW 559,481,375) in Korea, as Defendant A, the representative director of the Defendant Company, with respect to his own business, without filing a quarantine report or issuing an export quarantine certificate.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Application of investigation reports (inspection on quarantine of the exported livestock products), B export performance table, and appraisal report Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 279(1) and 270(3) of the Customs Act.

arrow