logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.03.10 2015고단2899
강제추행
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months;

2.Provided, That the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person hospitalized in the D Hospital located in Gwangju Northern-gu C (hereinafter “instant hospital”) in 907 due to reflective paralysis, etc., and the victim E (V, 24 years old) is a work clinic in charge of the Defendant.

On July 14, 2015, at around 11:30, the Defendant, who was receiving treatment from the victim of the instant hospital by enjoying 907, the instant hospital, and “Chhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

"At the end of the treatment period, you have to take charge of the hands of the victim himself/herself, and terminate the treatment period.

The defect that the injured person intends to go to a sick room is believed to be the end of the defendant in order to punish both arms, and the accused scam scam scam scam scam, and scam scam scam scams and bucks scams of the victim, and scam scam scam scam

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. Statement made by the police to E (victim);

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. Investigation report (the physical condition of a suspect) (the defendant and his/her defense counsel shall be denied that there is no fact that the defendant and his/her defense counsel forced the victim E to commit the same act as the criminal facts stated in the judgment

However, in full view of the following facts and circumstances that can be recognized by the above evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, it can be recognized that the defendant committed an act of taking the body of the victim E as stated in the judgment of the court, and the above act of the defendant constitutes an indecent act that infringes upon the victim E's sexual freedom.

Therefore, the above argument by the defendant and his defense counsel cannot be accepted.

1) In a case where the statements of the witness, including the victim, are mutually consistent and consistent with the facts charged, they shall not be dismissed without permission unless there is any separate and reliable evidence to deem that they are objectively acceptable from an objective perspective. The main part of the witness’s statements are as follows.

arrow