1. The Defendant’s KRW 220,638,846 for the Plaintiff and the following: 5% per annum from July 11, 2009 to September 3, 2014.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) Nonparty B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”).

C) At around 8:40 on July 11, 2009, in the workplace located in Chungcheong Budget-gun D (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) E (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) in the workplace located in Chungcheong Budget-gun D.

(B) During the process of moving the advanced scrap metal into the workplace within B due to the transactional relationship between the scrap metal and the Defendant’s side, the Plaintiff did not look at the Plaintiff who was in compliance with the said work, and the Defendant’s vehicle moved the vehicle, and the Plaintiff’s body was cut between the parts behind the driver’s seat of the Defendant vehicle and the scrap metal, thereby causing the Plaintiff to suffer injury, such as the injury of the Plaintiff’s body and power lines on the part of the parts following the driver’s seat and the body of the Defendant’s vehicle, and the injury to the Plaintiff’s body (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) The Defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract for Reddy Business (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle B as named insured person B.

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case as an insurer.

C. The Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant is exempt from personal compensation II is exempt from liability on 14. Exemptions in the insurance clause of this case.

1. 일반 면책사항 (2) 대인배상Ⅱ-⑨-가목에서 “기명피보험자 또는 그 부모, 배우자 및 자녀. 만약, 이 피보험자가 법인인 경우에는 이사와 감사 또는 그 부모, 배우자, 자녀”가 죽거나 다친 경우에는 대인배상Ⅱ에 해당하는 손해를 보상하지 않는 것으로 규정하고 있는바(이하 ‘이 사건 면책조항’이라 한다), 원고는 2006. 3. 31.부터 이 사건 사고 당시까지 기명피보험자인 B의 감사로 재직하였으므로, 원고가 이 사건 사고로 입은 손해 중 대인배상Ⅰ을 넘어선 대인배상Ⅱ에 해당하는 손해에 대하여는 피고에게 보험금 지급의무가...