All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. In light of all the circumstances, including the fact that the Defendants are against the summary of the grounds for appeal, the fact that there is no record of the same kind of crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court (Defendant A: imprisonment of one year, confiscation, additional collection of 44,617,00 won / Defendant B’s imprisonment of one year, confiscation, additional collection of 61,147,00 won) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the Defendants were aware of the crime of this case and are against the law. Defendant A was subject to a fine of another type twice in the case of Defendant A, Defendant B was not subject to a fine of another type five times in the case of Defendant B, and the Defendants voluntarily surrenders to investigation authorities and cooperate with the investigation.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the Defendants in collusion with one studio J which operated the business of arranging commercial sex acts in officetels and leased eight studio rooms, such as the Internet commercial sex acts brokerage sites and car pages, and then, the Defendants employed 7 or 8 commercial sex acts women and arranged commercial sex acts by notifying them of the studio gate studios in which sexual sex acts are conducted from May 29, 2012 to September 16, 2012, and arranging commercial sex acts by using 120,000 to 30,000 to 50,000,000 won per man's cash for the purpose of raising the revenue of 2,106,000 to 2,840,000,000,000 won in total from January 4, 2013 to 20,000,000 won in the aggregate of these commercial sex acts to be conducted by the Defendants to 60,500,08.