The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant in the facts charged is a driver affiliated with Cbu-si.

On July 20, 2013, at around 18:30 on July 20, 2013, the Defendant stopped a taxi operated according to a stop signal around the shooting distance in the Seodong-gu Gwangju Metropolitan City.

At this time, when the vehicle operated by the victim D, who followed the defendant's taxi, was obstructed by the defendant's taxi, the vehicle was frightened by the defendant's taxi, but the defendant did not turn on by the way of driving the taxi, etc., and the victim was frightd with the defendant's taxi driver's windowd from the vehicle, and the defect in the claim was disputed with each other, such as "the defendant was frightened by the victim" and "the defendant was frightened by the victim."

When a male guest who was on board a cab in the name unfortunate of Mad Defendant 1 is able to take a bath to the victim, and the defendant is dissatisfied with the victim's trial expenses, the defendant committed assault against the victim's left breast part by drinking the victim's drinking at one time.

2. The facts charged in this case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the facts can be acknowledged that the victim expressed his/her intention not to be punished after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.