Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On April 14, 2019, the Defendant committed assault on the road of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Jongno-ro 288 Madro 288 Madro on the ground that he was using a taxi operated by B (manam and 58) on the road before he was aware of the facts charged, on the ground that he was using the taxi in front of the public notice book, and that he was “the victim was able to abide by her, but the victim was said to use another taxi.”
2. Determination
(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;
(b) Crimes of non-compliance with will: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act.
C. On July 9, 2019, after the institution of public prosecution, the victim’s “application for non-prosecution of punishment and written agreement” was submitted.
(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;