Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 80,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

At around 03:30 on September 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) opened the back of a taxi for business use operated by the victim B (the age of 51) on the street in front of the exit 4-1 Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant: (b) stated, without any justifiable reason, two male customers on the name in favor of the victim B (the age of 51); (c) stated, “I am the same family; (d) I am, like I am, I am, and am,” and (d) made customers get off the taxi in front of the exit 9-1 Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si; and (d) made them get off the taxi.

After that, the Defendant: (a) took a bath to the victim who requested another taxi to go on; and (b) took a bath to the victim’s taxi driver’s seat, and did not take a bath to the victim’s taxi driver’s seat, and obstructed the victim’s taxi business by force for about 20 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol protocol law to B

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The part concerning dismissal of prosecution under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse;

1. On September 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 03:30 on September 17, 2016, 2016, the Defendant: (b) turned off the victim B from the taxi in front of the exit hole No. 4-1 water source 9, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, to the taxi in front of the exit hole No. 4-1 water source; and (c) assaulted the victim’s breath by sp

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim submitted a written application for no punishment to the effect that he/she would not want punishment against the Defendant to the instant court on September 30, 2016, which was after the instant indictment was instituted, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.