logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2017.04.26 2016고정17
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

D and the husband E of the defendant are engaged in the same heavy equipment business, and the F is a wife of D.

D In order to prevent F from filing a divorce lawsuit and disposing of a refrigerer in F’s name with the Defendant on October 7, 2014, while having been suffering from F and home fireation, F arbitrarily prepared a loan certificate in F’s name and provisionally seized the refrigerer using it.

1. On October 8, 2014, the Defendant and D shall set up two copies of the private document forgery as follows: (a) the route for the public service of the public service center of the Masan-gu Police Station in Masan-si, Masan-si, Masan-si, Masan-si; and (b) D shall use a test color pen in blank as “a certificate of borrowing and a daily gold: 25,000,000,000, and the monthly interest on the loan regularly borrowed the above amount, at the request of the obligee, prior to the month in which the obligee requests the repayment.

The debtor's address: Changwon-si Mapo-si apartment G 307-504 F, H, and joint guarantor: D, resident number I, and telephone: J; and Defendant A stated "A: address A, and address" as "Mapo-gu L, May 1014, 201."

Accordingly, the defendant and D forged a copy of the borrowed certificate in F, a private document related to rights and obligations, for the purpose of exercising them in collusion.

2. Exercising the relevant investigation document;

A. On October 15, 2014, the Defendant, as indicated in D, filed an application for provisional seizure of the excavation machines in the name of F in the Changwon District Court 16-Do, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon District Court 7-Do, Changwon District Court 7-Do, Changwon-si, and submitted the forged borrowing certificate to the above court employees who knew of such forgery as mentioned above as evidence of the said application, as if it were a document duly formed.

Accordingly, the defendant and D conspired with each other to exercise one copy of a borrowed deed in the name of F which is a forged private document.

B. On November 12, 2014, the Defendant filed a lawsuit claiming a loan with F and D as the Defendant in the said Changwon District Court Branch of Msan Branch of the Seoul District Court, and is unaware of such forgery.

arrow