beta
Escopics
Defendant
Appellant. An appellant
Defendant
Prosecutor
Fixed-term medical care
Judgment of the lower court
Suwon District Court Decision 2009 High Court Decision 1933 Decided September 29, 2009
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
The sentencing of the court below is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
In light of the fact that the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment due to fraud, fabrication of private documents, violation of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, etc., and the Defendant again committed the instant crime since he was sentenced to each imprisonment due to fraud in 2006 and 2007 and did not have completed the execution of the sentence. Examining all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and circumstances leading to the instant crime, the lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.
3. Conclusion
Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges Lee Dong-chul (Presiding Judge)