logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.12.13 2017나22997
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The gist of the parties’ assertion 1) The Plaintiff is the owner of the C building 205 (hereinafter “205”) in Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu. The Plaintiff is the owner of the C building 405 (hereinafter “405”) owned by the Defendant.

() Since water leakage occurred from toilets from June 2014 to September 20, 2014, from which water leakage occurred to 205, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the sum of KRW 5,330,000,000,000,000,000,000 won for water leakage detection expenses incurred by the Plaintiff, KRW 333,35,000,000,000,000,000,000 won for water leakage expenses incurred by the Plaintiff, and KRW 4,733,00,000,000,000,000 and damages for delay for mental damage incurred by the Plaintiff. However, it was two years prior to September 2014, which did not occur due to the structural defect of the entire building, the water leakage of each unit, etc. was not generated, and the water leakage amount was not generated from the water leakage of 405,05.25.

B. The Plaintiff’s assertion and claim are not sufficient to acknowledge that the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone was insufficient to acknowledge that the Plaintiff suffered damage to the Plaintiff’s assertion due to leakage of the toilet part 405, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this.

2. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the plaintiff.

arrow