1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance is revoked, and the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed in entirety.

2. The total cost of the lawsuit.

1.The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of the appraisal commission made by the court of first instance with respect to Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 6 (including the number with which each number is attached; hereinafter the same shall apply), each statement, and the appraiser F of the court of first instance:

Plaintiff

A1) On July 17, 2013, the Defendant’s general motor vehicle insurance (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff A”) was driving the said vehicle on the road front of the I cafeteria located later than the I cafeteria around 20:00 on July 17, 2013, and Plaintiff A owned by the Defendant.

2) The instant accident was caused by the shocking accident (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) After the instant accident, Plaintiff A’s vehicle repair business was repaired in the Round Co., Ltd., Ltd., and the Defendant paid the repair cost of KRW 4,886,6403,257,080 as insurance money.

3) On August 17, 2013, Plaintiff A’s main repair content of Plaintiff B’s vehicle is exchange with fences, inter-ste panel board board, etc.

(2) After the accident of this case No. 2, the plaintiff B was repaired in the automobile repair business operator M, and the defendant paid 873,345 won of the repair cost as insurance money. 3) The main repair content of the plaintiff B vehicle is the exchange of the rear text, the center lurbs and lurbs, etc.

C. Plaintiff C1) On August 11, 2013, Plaintiff C (hereinafter “Plaintiff C”) was driving the said vehicle on the front road near Gangnam-gu Seoul (Seoul), around 17:10 on August 11, 2013, by a numberless vehicle driver who purchased the Defendant’s comprehensive vehicle insurance policy. Plaintiff C is the Plaintiff C’s vehicle.

3) The instant accident was caused by the shocking accident (hereinafter “instant third accident”).

(2) After the third accident of this case, Plaintiff C.