logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.10.19 2017고정1776
수질및수생태계보전에관한법률위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

Defendant

A and Defendant B did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and Defendant B are corporations established with the trade name of “C” in Gyeonggi-do, Gyeonggi-do, for the purpose of jointly operating a fibering processing business, and Defendant C is a corporation established for the purpose of textile manufacturing and salt color processing business, etc.

Any person who intends to install wastewater discharge facilities shall obtain permission from or report to the competent authorities.

1. Defendants A and B did not report to the competent authority on the joint crime, but installed and operated 8 high voltage chromosomes and 5 high voltage chromosomes, which are wastewater discharge facilities, at the above joint-stock company C from around December 30, 2016 to March 16, 2017.

2. In relation to the Defendant’s business, the Defendant Co., Ltd. established 8 high pressure colorers (larges) and 5 high pressure colorers (larges), which are wastewater discharge facilities, without reporting to the competent authorities, as described in paragraph (1) by this private person A.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A written accusation, a written accusation, a field control photograph, a business registration certificate, a pending report on the charges for operating wastewater terminal treatment facilities, a certificate registered in full, a written statement of additional accusation, each investigation report (specific suspects, B twice examination and investigation of suspects and suspects, etc.), and a corporate statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A and Defendant B: Article 76 Subparag. 2 and Article 33(1) of the Water Quality and A’s Conservation Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines

(b) Defendant C: Articles 81, 76 subparag. 2, and 33 subparag. 1 of the Water Quality and Water Quality Conservation Act

1. Defendant A and Defendant B: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, respectively;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are examined; the Defendants recognized all the criminal facts of the instant case and against their mistakes; and the Defendant.

arrow