Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A A is a person who installs wastewater discharge facilities in the name of “B” and operates a fibering business. Defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of textile manufacturing and salt processing business, etc., and Defendant B is a corporation that intends to install and operate wastewater discharge facilities shall report to the competent authorities.

1. From July 19, 200 to March 20, 2017, Defendant A, without reporting to the competent authorities, installed and operated a high-tension 13 chromosome (large) which is an wastewater discharge facility at the factory of the said stock company B.

2. Defendant B, at the above date and place, committed the above violation as to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A written accusation, a written accusation, a field control photograph, a business registration certificate, current report on the charges for the operation of the wastewater treatment facilities in liquidation wastewater, a certificate registered in whole, and an additional statement that is an accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 76 Subparag. 2 and Article 33(1) of the Water Quality and Water Quality Conservation Act; selection of fines

(b) Defendant B: Articles 81, 76 subparag. 2, and 33 subparag. 1 of the Water Quality and Water Quality Conservation Act

1. Defendant A to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: (a) examining the reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; (b) the Defendants recognized all the criminal facts of the instant case and against their mistakes; (c) appears to have many companies installing and operating wastewater discharge facilities without reporting within the area where Defendant B’s business site is located; and (d) the Defendants appear to have caused the instant accusation by failing to pay the wastewater treatment charges; and (c) Defendant A violated the Immigration Control Act around 2016.