logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.02.09 2016고단1274 (3)
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2] On November 29, 2016, the Daejeon District Court sentenced the Defendant to a suspended sentence of two years for a crime of fraud, which became final and conclusive on December 7, 2016.

C aware that the defendant who became aware of in the course of the introduction by the branch wants to obtain a loan, C will help the defendant arrange a loan or a financial right loan to the extent of credit and help the bankruptcy proceedings.

The purpose of "A" is to make a proposal to the effect that it is registered as the representative director of D, which is a mobile phone sales store operated by C, according to the above proposal, and after raising credit, A received a loan in the name of the defendant from a financial institution, and used the loan and used the loan in the name of the defendant

1. On February 20, 2014, the Defendant and C entered into a contract for a mid-term loan with a company selling used cars with a view to obtaining KRW 27,00,000,000 from the victim as collateral, in a used cars trading company with a view to having no knowledge of the trade name in the Seo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Daejeon, Daejeon, under the name of the Defendant.

However, in fact, the defendant and C did not have any idea to operate the above vehicle after purchasing the vehicle, and they planned to prepare cash by providing the vehicle as security to others, and did not have any intention or ability to repay the loan.

Nevertheless, the Defendant and C had, as such, deceiving an employee in charge of the name in the victim capital company, and immediately received 27,000,000 won as a loan from the injured party under the name of the middle and middle loan.

Accordingly, the defendant and C were provided property by deceiving the victim in collusion.

2. The Defendant and C did not have the intent or ability to settle the price even if they purchased goods by using the credit card in the name of the Defendant.

arrow