Defendants are innocent.

1. The Defendants, who were residents of the D apartment in the Namyang-si-si, were 106 representative E, the 106 representative of the 106 representative of the 2010 council of occupants’ representatives, thought that he had been in the office as an auditor of the 2010 council of occupants’ representatives, did not follow the procedures stipulated in the management rules of the remaining apartment, and did not intend to dismiss E with the consent of the occupants

1. On October 14, 2013, the Defendants’ illegal use of the apartment management office at the above apartment management office: around that time, Defendant A prepared a public notice to the effect that he/she would be present at the same time for the dismissal of the representative E without the consent of 106 representative E, and even though the Defendants stated that he/she cannot affix the seal of the election commission in the public notice of these contents from F, the chairman of the apartment election commission, even though he/she stated that he/she could not affix the seal of the election commission on the public notice of these contents, he/she illegally used the private person by signing that he/she obtained the official seal of G from G from the election commission as if he/she obtained the F’s permission.

2. Defendant A’s superior investigator’s event held that Defendant A posted the above notice stamped by the election commission’s seal on the bulletin board of residents in an apartment elevator, thereby allowing occupants who may know of the fact to be seen as a document that was duly formed.

3. On October 19, 2013, the Defendants interfered with the duties of the Defendants at the conference room of D apartment apartment units around 20:00, the Defendants participated in the process of meeting the said conference under the supervision of H, the chairman of the said conference, at the time, and considered E’s qualification as a representative, and expressed desire to the said representatives who were on the site of about 30 minutes, and expressed their dismissal, and interfered with the duties of the said conference by exercising force.

2. Determination

A. As to the forgery of a private person and the uttering of a private investigator, the Defendants’ official seal of the chairman of the election management committee with the F’s consent.