Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who was the chairperson of the council of occupants' representatives of apartment complexes of Busan Seo-gu C2 and 3.

1. On May 22, 2013, the Defendant interfered with the affairs of the said apartment election commission by force by bringing an official seal of the election commission, which had been kept there, with the intention of interfering with the election affairs of the 18th representative election, at the office of the Dong representative executive office and the election commission office located in the said 3 complex management office.

2. On May 22, 2013, the Defendant: (a) stated that, for the purpose of interfering with the election affairs of the 19:00 representative of each Dong on May 22, 2013, the 18th apartment complex 2,3 complexes 35 bulletin boards and elevators posted the above apartment complex 2, and the 35 bulletin boards and elevators, the 2,35 apartment complexes 2, and the 35 bulletin boards and the “written public notice of recruitment of assistant personnel for election management,” and the “written public notice of additional registration of candidates for representatives of each Dong (third)” were removed and sent by security guards, etc., the instant facts charged

By force damage, it interfered with the duties of the apartment election commission.

3. On June 1, 2013, at around 17:30, the Defendant stated that each public notice given in Paragraph 2, which is attached to the same place as described in Paragraph 2, is removed by security guards, etc., and the facts charged in the instant case are “lurged.” However, it is recognized as being duly adopted and investigated by the evidence duly adopted by this Court.

By force damage, it interfered with the duties of the apartment election commission.

4. On June 8, 2013, at around 12:00, the Defendant stated that “the notice of the election of the president” attached to the same place as indicated in paragraph (2) was removed by the security guards, etc., and the instant facts charged are “lurged.” However, this Court duly adopted and investigated as such.

The apartment is damaged by force.