Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 12, 2017, at around 22:55, the Defendant who interfered with his/her duties attempted to drink in the E danran bar operated by the victim D in Jeju, while drinking alcohol, and throw away the table table from the door to the door of the bar under the influence of alcohol to his/her employees.

approximately 20 minutes, such as cryping the bath, holding a food on the floor, and holding beer cups, etc. on the floor, which had been on the floor.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's dan business by force.

2. On June 12, 2017, at around 23:05, the Defendant: (a) received a request to speak personal information from a slope G belonging to the Fdistrict of the Police Station in the Jeju-dong Police Station, the Defendant, at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1) around 23:05; (b) stated, “I wished to take the part of the slope G’s lusium, to go off, to go off, to go off, to go off, to go off, and to go off beyond the floor by going to G with the lusium’s lusium, and going to go off, by going to go to G with the lusium.”

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made in relation to G or D;

1. Relevant photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling List;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be taken into account all the various sentencing conditions specified in the instant argument. In particular, the following conditions shall be considered: (a) reflects the following circumstances; (b) the agreement with the victim D; and (c) the Defendant’s leakage is disadvantageous to the fact that the health of the Defendant is not good due to dysium: (a) the Defendant’s around 209.